What proof exists
2 profile clues across ICP, pain, and competitor language.
These claims are intentionally presented as reviewable guesses until persistence and source-provider layers are approved.
Live preview boundaryLocal/mock review mode: no Supabase/Postgres runtime, no email, no analytics, no outreach, no export/copy/send/social/live-provider actions, no production DB mutation.
external actions: falsepreview only
Step 2 · Product profile
example-smoke.voxprospect.local: what it sells, who hurts, and what to avoid.
Safe fixture profile for DB smoke.
real intake: truepersistence: postgres_internal_betaproduction DB: trueexternal actions: false
Build buyer-intent mapReturn to intakeProfile is the checkpoint before any opportunity or lead review.
Operator next step
Convert this profile into buyer-intent lanes.
The intent map is where ICP, pain language, exclusions, and source-hunter instructions become one review path.
Continue to intent map →Blocked / safe
No CRM, DB, email, export, or outreach action is enabled.
The profile is local/mock preview context only; it cannot mutate a production database or contact anyone.
ICP guesses
Who the desk should understand first.
operators
Competitor frame
Alternative language to compare against.
Pains solved
Signals to carry into source hunting later.
manual prospecting
Profile boundaryProfile review feeds only the local/mock intent map. Supabase/Postgres, OmniMail, analytics, outreach, export, copy/send, and live providers remain off.
Build intent map